Inside Lacrosse’s August Issue devoted good bit of space to Issues with Pace of Play in College Lacrosse. There were 36 listed, though not all are covered by me, and it seems the only thing lacrosse people can agree on with the issue is that something needs to happen. Here is my take on some of the ideas suggested in the article:
Changing the sticks will just ruin the game. Many players, especially in college, have never used an older stick do bringing those back would just make play sloppier, the game less exciting, and growth of the sport would be stunted. Plus, youth rule changes would follow, and there are plenty of parents that would not be happy that they have to buy another stick for their kid. Eliminating LSMs and or faceoffs would mean 4+ kids on each team go from starter to not having a spot on the team, plus, killing faceoffs would eliminate the advantage of a good FOGO. 6 poles also a bad idea because then there is the time to sub them and games would be less scoring. Making players line up farther at the X would be too big of a change for guys that have been taking faceoffs on the line all their life and I foresee longer battles at X. Outlawing zones would be impossible to enforce. And just is stupid. I like the shot clock, it’s working in the pros and it would make the transition easier. I also like only having 8 (2 A, D, 3 M) or 7 (2, 2, 2) on the field. Much more space. Finally, not allowing teams to bring up an Attacker on man down faceoffs is something that should’ve existed for a while. Not sure what that would do for pace of play, but I don’t get why teams are allowed to do it.







